Skip to the shortlist
Peptide ClarityGuide
Comparison

NAD+ or glutathione: two popular injections, two different jobs

They're often sold as a pair. The research behind each one is very different, and so are the safety notes.

Peptide Clarity Guide

Heads up: Peptide Clarity Guide works with partners, and a few buttons below pay us if you join (you pay the same). Here partners are listed first; that never changes a word we write about anyone. How we earn.

The short answer

They do different jobs: NAD+ is a coenzyme for energy metabolism, glutathione an antioxidant. Neither is FDA-approved for energy, skin or aging, and both are compounded. Glutathione has small oral and topical trials for skin tone and insulin sensitivity; injected NAD+ has no wellness outcome trial. For skin, glutathione's evidence is closer. For energy, neither has proof.

Key takeaways

  • NAD+ is a coenzyme cells use to make energy; glutathione is an antioxidant cells make themselves.
  • Neither is FDA-approved for energy, skin or aging. Both are compounded ingredients FDA is still evaluating.
  • Glutathione has small oral and topical trials on skin tone and insulin sensitivity. Injected NAD+ has no wellness outcome trial.
  • FDA warned about contaminated glutathione injections in 2019 and again in August 2026.
  • Right now, glutathione injections run $57.32–$329.99 a month and NAD+ injections $79–$303.08.

Here's the short version. NAD+ and glutathione show up on the same menus, often a click apart. One is sold for energy, the other for skin and "glow". The trials behind them are small, and they mostly tested pills and creams, not shots. Pick by goal, and read the safety section before you pick at all.

What each molecule does in the body

Both sound essential because they are. Your body makes both. The open question is whether adding more from outside changes anything you'd notice. That's what the trials below try to answer.

Evidence by goal

This is the table that decides it. Each cell is the strongest human evidence found for that goal, with the form that was actually tested.

Human evidence as published; prices from each program's own site
NAD+Glutathione
What it isCoenzyme for energy metabolismAntioxidant made by your cells
FDA statusNot approved; compounded, FDA still evaluating itNot approved for wellness; compounded, FDA still evaluating it; safety alerts in 2019 and 2026
SkinNo human trial foundTopical plus oral lowered a skin melanin index vs placebo over 8 weeks in 46 people [3]
Energy or fatigueNo outcome trial for injected NAD+ [5]No trial found
Blood sugar and insulinNo trial of injected NAD+ foundOral, 3 weeks: insulin sensitivity rose in 20 men with obesity [2]
Raising the body's own levelsInfused NAD+ cleared from plasma fast in one pilot [6]Oral, 6 months: blood stores up 30–35%, gone a month after stopping [1]
Aging or lifespanNoneNone
Forms programs sellInjection, nasal spray, oral, patch, creamInjection, nasal spray, patch
Monthly cost (injection)$79–$303.08$57.32–$329.99

Status from FDA's 503A bulk-substance categories, updated May 14, 2026 [10].

Notice the pattern. Glutathione's results come from pills and creams. A dermatology review found the case for IV glutathione on skin rests on one poorly designed study, and that oral and topical results were modest and faded after stopping [4]. So "glutathione has skin evidence" doesn't mean "glutathione shots have skin evidence".

NAD+ has the opposite problem. It's sold mostly as shots, and a 2026 systematic review found no outcome trial of injected or infused NAD+ for anti-aging or wellness [5]. Oral building blocks like NMN raise NAD+ in blood, but that's a different product.

Two details from the glutathione trials are worth knowing. In the insulin study, sensitivity improved but markers of oxidative stress didn't change, so the antioxidant story wasn't what moved [2]. And in the six-month stores study, levels went back to where they started within a month of stopping [1]. Whatever glutathione does, it seems to last only as long as you keep taking it.

The one randomized trial of IV NAD+ that does exist was in heart failure. A seven-day course added to standard care nudged heart pumping function at one month, while the six-month difference in heart events wasn't statistically significant [7]. That's a hospital treatment for sick hearts, not evidence for a wellness shot.

Which one fits which goal

Here's how the evidence lines up by goal. None of it is a reason to start, only a way to set expectations.

  • Skin tone. Glutathione is the one with trials, but they used pills and creams. If skin is the goal, ask whether a topical or oral form makes more sense than a shot.
  • Energy. Neither has a trial showing more energy. If you try NAD+ for energy, treat it as an experiment with your prescriber, not a sure thing.
  • Blood sugar. One three-week oral glutathione study in 20 men with obesity. That's a lead, not a treatment, and it isn't a reason to change any diabetes medicine.
  • Aging. No human trial has tested either one for aging or lifespan.

If the evidence gap bothers you, that's a fair reaction. Both are legal to prescribe as compounded drugs, but legal to compound isn't the same as proven to work.

Safety: FDA's glutathione alerts, and NAD+'s blank page

Glutathione has the clearer safety record, and it's not a reassuring one. In August 2026, FDA said at least 30 patients had reactions after IV glutathione made by different compounding pharmacies. All of it traced to one supplement-grade lot from the supplier Medisca. Reported problems included fever, chills, pain, dizziness, signs of shock and sepsis-like symptoms, and some people were hospitalized. Two Texas pharmacies recalled products for high endotoxin levels [8].

It had happened before. In February 2019, FDA warned compounders about a repackaged glutathione powder after seven patients had reactions consistent with high endotoxin [9]. The lesson both times: the raw ingredient matters, and supplement-grade powder isn't made for injection.

NAD+ has no FDA label, so there's no FDA-reviewed side-effect list for it. That isn't the same as safe. It means nobody has collected the data in a way FDA has reviewed.

What each costs

Injection prices overlap. Right now, glutathione plans run $57.32–$329.99 a month and NAD+ plans $79–$303.08. For the full NAD+ breakdown, see the NAD+ injection cost guide.

Two things move the real number. Some programs advertise a lower first month on a prepaid plan, then bill the full rate. Others bill every four weeks instead of monthly, which adds a charge each year. Ask for the price from month two on, and ask whether the plan renews on its own.

Programs that offer both

These programs post a monthly injection price for both, so you can compare like with like.

Programs listing both injections, prices from each program's own site
ProgramNAD+ injectionGlutathione injection
Live Vital$149$99.67
Shed$169$119
HealthRx$161$152

Also offered by (no standing monthly price published): LTTL, AgelessRx, bmiMD, Direct Meds Partner. Sorted by glutathione price. Some programs show a lower first month; these are the ongoing monthly prices.

Other programs list both but don't print a standing monthly price for each, such as Eden and Belle Health. Ask for the month-two total in writing.

Taking both

Some programs prescribe the two together. No trial has tested the pair, so there's no evidence either way that they add up to more. If you're considering both, your prescriber should know about each one.

Still deciding by goal? Our skin shortlist and our energy shortlist each start from what you want, and the 30-second match narrows it down. If the real choice is how to take NAD+, see NAD+ injections or IV drips.

Providers that offer NAD+ or Glutathione

  • GalaPartner

    People who want weight, menopause or longevity care in one app and can commit to a longer plan.

    Visit site →
  • Strut HealthPartner

    People who want one refill charge covering the visit, follow-ups and shipping.

    Visit site →
  • AgelessRx

    People comparing several prescriptions who can check each formulation, renewal and care plan.

    Read the review →

Compare more providers →

Frequently asked

Is NAD+ or glutathione better for energy?
Neither has a trial showing more energy in healthy people. A 2026 review found no outcome trial of injected NAD+ for wellness, and no energy trial of glutathione was found.
Is glutathione or NAD+ better for skin?
Glutathione has small trials on skin tone, but they tested pills and creams, not injections. NAD+ has no skin trial. Results from the glutathione trials faded after people stopped.
Can you take NAD+ and glutathione together?
Some programs prescribe both. No trial has tested the pair, so whether they add anything together is unknown. Tell your prescriber about both.
Which costs less, NAD+ or glutathione injections?
Their ranges overlap. Right now, glutathione injections run $57.32–$329.99 a month and NAD+ injections $79–$303.08.
Is either one FDA approved?
No, not for energy, skin or aging. Both are compounded ingredients that FDA is still evaluating, which licensed pharmacies may make for now under FDA's interim policy.

Sources

  1. [1] Richie JP Jr. Randomized controlled trial of oral glutathione supplementation on body stores of glutathione (2015). PMID 24791752
  2. [2] Søndergård SD. The effects of 3 weeks of oral glutathione supplementation on whole body insulin sensitivity in obese males with and without type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial (2021). PMID 33740389
  3. [3] Wahab S. Combination of topical and oral glutathione as a skin-whitening agent: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial (2021). PMID 33871071
  4. [4] Sonthalia S. Glutathione for skin lightening: a regnant myth or evidence-based verity? (2018). PMID 29445569
  5. [5] Gallagher C. NAD⁺ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence (2026). PMID 41655607
  6. [6] Grant R. A Pilot Study Investigating Changes in the Human Plasma and Urine NAD+ Metabolome During a 6 Hour Intravenous Infusion of NAD (2019). PMID 31572171
  7. [7] Yu X. Effect of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial (2026). PMID 40954388
  8. [8] FDA reminds compounders not to use dietary supplement grade glutathione for injectables (August 27, 2026) (2026). FDA
  9. [9] FDA highlights concerns with using dietary ingredient glutathione to compound sterile injectables (June 7, 2019) (2019). FDA
  10. [10] Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A (categories, updated May 14, 2026) (2026). FDA

Related research